| Criterion |
Weight |
Fail |
D |
C |
B |
A |
| Group
Reports and Management |
20% |
Little or No progress or
notification of progress |
Weak or cursory attempt at
showing discussion as a group, with little writeup, or poor
prose. |
Reasonable illustration of
discussion and unified work, with examples. |
Good discussion showing
thought about management and group work examples |
Evidence of group
management with documentation and good teamwork examples, and use of the
web to illustrate this |
| Technical Explanations |
15% |
Sparse or incorrect
explanations |
Brief explanations, mostly
valid |
Reasonable, correct
explanations
demonstrating use of a few features of
Macromodia |
Good explanations
demonstrating use of many features of Macromodia |
Excellent explanations
showing insight and thorough understanding of the full Macromedia
package |
| Storyboard and Macromedia Presentation |
45% |
Unrelated
storyboard
to
presentation, and shallow or incomplete presentation AND/OR
non-working/ tested
CD |
Brief, ill prepared
storyboard whichis difficult to relate to either the 'card' or
presentation, and no CD cover |
Reasonable storyboard
which illustrates ideas well, reflected in the presentation and business
card |
Good storyboard, well
presented and iluustrative of concepts and ideas of group and the card,
and reflected attractively in the presentation |
Good storyboard with good
illustrations of proposed ideas linked to resultant material developed.
Strongly reflectve of the cards concepts and enjoyable to use/
watch |
| Report structure |
20% |
Messy,no page structure,
not following web guidlines. |
Mostly unstructured,
showing scant regard for web design guidlines. |
Reasonable
structure |
Good structure with main
page, table of contents, section links and use of relevant
imagery. |
Excellent structure, reads
well, follows web design/ structure guidlines, follwoing and carrying the
theme of the
presentation |